Every fault included in a NeoKinema model requires a geologic
offset-rate target (which may be zero) and associated uncertainty (which may be
huge!).
In Step 11, we already computed some better target
offset-rates and uncertainties with program Slippery, and arranged them
into a table.
NeoKinema also offers the OPTION to add firm
lower-limits and upper-limits on each offset-rate.
This option greatly increases the realism of the resulting models; for example,
it can prevent faults from slipping in the wrong direction!
Therefore, this opportunity should be seized in most cases.
Lower-limits and upper-limits on offset-rates (if used) go into Column I and
Column J (respectively) of the fault-offset-rate data table that we began to
create in Step 11.
Their units are mm/a ( = km / Ma), just like the values in Columns D (target
offset rate) and E (associated standard deviation, or “sigma”).
These values (if used) would usually be non-negative.
There are 3 ways that you can choose to treat each fault:
1.
Accept the 95%-confidence bounds on geologic offset rate that were
already computed by program Slippery (and which are already entered in
the table).
Admittedly, this means treating 95%-confidence limits as if they were
100%-confidence limits, which is a slightly artificial reduction of
uncertainty.
On the other hand, these values are algorithmic, objective, and reproduceable,
with no subjective component.
2.
Set the lower-limit to “0.0”
(in Column I), but leave the upper limit blank (in Column J).
This will prevent the fault from slipping the “wrong way” (e.g., Thrust
instead of Normal, or Right-lateral instead of Left-lateral).
If you are not convinced about the validity of the specific limits coming from Slippery,
this may be a reasonable option.
3.
Leave both columns empty, so that there are no firm limits on offset
rate (just the “soft” limits implied by the Gaussian distribution described in
Columns D and E).
This option should probably be reserved for those few faults whose
slip-sense is really unknown.